• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Treyburn Human Resources Group

Treyburn Human Resources Group

Your Human Resources Partner for Achieving Business Results.

  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Consultants
      • Ken Cage
      • Lynn Zera
      • Carole White
      • Abraham Robinson
      • Ed Halphen
      • Tim Raher
  • Services
    • Strategic Analysis
    • Fractional Human Resources Leadership
    • Interim Leadership
    • Project-Based Consulting Services
    • Employee Engagement
    • Customized Training Programs
  • Capabilities
    • Talent Management
    • Change Management
    • Employee Relations
    • Compensation and Benefits
    • Organizational Development
    • Learning and Development
  • Why Choose Us
  • Blog
  • Contact
972-895-2464

Why Today’s C-Suite May Soon Be a Thing Of The Past

You are here: Home / Uncategorized / Why Today’s C-Suite May Soon Be a Thing Of The Past

April 10, 2014 by Treyburn HR

WashingtonPost

Why today’s C-suite may soon be a thing of the past; An argument that we need to rethink what qualifies someone to be a CEO, CFO, COO or other top leader.

By Sarah Halzack

10 April 2014

WashingtonPost.com

The model for assembling a team of top executives hasn’t changed much in recent decades. With titles such as chief operating officer, chief financial officer or chief human resources officer, companies have largely filled their C-suites with people who possess specialized expertise in one aspect of the business.

Now, a new paper by Eamonn Kelly of Deloitte Consulting argues that this model is poorly matched for today’s business climate and is in need of a massive overhaul. Kelly writes, “The bottom line is that if a company sticks with the C-suite model it probably has in place today, it might find it hard to remain competitive.”

So what’s wrong with the C-suite as we know it? Kelly says that today’s structure—in which functional specialists head up discrete teams—allows the divisions of a company to operate in silos with little integration or cohesion. That may have worked just fine in simpler times, he contends, but it’s ineffective for complex 21st-century businesses. Many firms are increasingly global enterprises, with workers and consumers in far-flung corners of the world. And rapid technological innovation means that the various divisions in any enterprise are increasingly interdependent. The advertising team relies on the I.T. team to engineer its new e-mail campaign; the human resources team relies on the marketing team to help build its employer brand.

The answer, Kelly writes, is to rethink how C-suite jobs are defined and the kind of people we hire to fill them. He calls this idea “C-suite 3.0,” and says it would be a key break from the iterations of leadership structures that have been most prevalent in the post-industrial era.

The need for a C-suite 2.0 began to crystallize in the 1980s, Kelly says. He defines C-suite 1.0 as the model embraced by General Motors and others as early as the 1920s, in which a tight-knit group of centralized, generalist managers comprised the leadership team.

Between today’s model and its predecessor, Kelly notes two key differences: Power has broadened in C-suite 2.0 to a larger group of people. A 2013 study by Harvard University researchers found that the number of people in the C-suite at large U.S. firms has doubled since the 1980’s. Three quarters of the increase was due to the addition of functional managers, or managers that oversee a specific unit of the business.

Kelly doesn’t ultimately offer up a precise vision of what C-suite 3.0 should look like. While he argues it needs to be characterized by less fragmentation and greater alignment, he also says that going back to a small group of generalists probably won’t serve today’s companies well.

If talent professionals are going to rethink how to build a pipeline of candidates for their most critical positions, Kelly says it’s up to them to define what that should look like.

Uncategorized

About Treyburn HR

Primary Sidebar

  • Popular
  • Recent

Topics

  • Announcements
  • Benefits
  • Compensation
  • Compliance
  • Employee Engagement
  • Employee Relations
  • How-To
  • HR Management
  • HR News
  • HR Programs
  • Interviews
  • Process
  • Retention
  • Staffing
  • Uncategorized

Treyburn Newsletter

Want the latest Strategies and important News on Human Resources? Subscribe and stay up-to-date and compliant.

Strategic Analysis

Call 972-895-2464 to schedule a consult today.

Contact Us

Footer

SERVICES

  • Strategic Analysis
  • Fractional HR Leadership
  • Interim Leadership
  • Project-Based Consulting
  • Employee Engagement
  • Customized Training Programs

CAPABILITIES

  • Talent Management
  • Change Management
  • Employee Relations
  • Compensation & Benefits
  • Organizational Development
  • Learning & Development

QUICK LINKS

  • About Us
  • Why Choose Us
  • Services
  • Capabilities
  • Testimonials
  • Read Our Blog

CONTACT US

180 State Street, Ste 225
Southlake, TX 76092
Get Directions
972-895-2464
info@treyburnhr.com
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 · Treyburn Human Resources Group · All Rights Reserved · Privacy · Terms · Designed by Banyan360

Copyright © 2023 · Business Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in